Supporting Victims of Unfounded Allegations of Abuse

Innocent and accused?

We’re here to help

Helpline 0333 335 5827

Abuse – Zero Tolerance

Home » About Us » Abuse – Zero Tolerance

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Where does FACT stand on abuse issues ?

As its name suggests FACT exists to support falsely accused or wrongly convicted carers, teachers and other professionals. We are not here to apologize for those professionals who have abused children in the past, or to excuse their behaviour.

FACT has a zero tolerance of abuse of any kind and has always condemned those who abuse or have abused children or adults.

In previous conferences we have made it clear that FACT has a duty to speak out against those who abuse children or adults and does so on many occasions. We also fully accept that professionals who work with children or adults have a greater duty of care to keep them safe and a greater responsibility not to abuse their position of trust.

Members must declare that they are innocent

FACT takes its obligations seriously and tries to act professionally in the way it operates and conducts itself. For several years now we have required prospective members to warrant that they are innocent of any allegations of abuse that have been made against them. We will not allow anyone to become a member of FACT if they have been found in possession of child pornography.

Most people we support are not accused of sex offences

It is also perhaps worth bearing in mind that the vast majority of people we support have not been accused of sex offences or physical assaults but rather of abuse in the general sense i.e. alleged emotional abuse, alleged poor practice, failure to act etc. More than half of those who contact us who have been accused  have not either in the past or at the time of referral been the subject of a police investigation. As far as the criminal law is concerned ARE factually innocent of any alleged abuse.

We use the term ‘falsely accused’ in the broadest sense to include exaggerated, induced, or fabricated complaints.

We have to work on trust

We accept that we have to take on trust those who maintain their innocence – are indeed innocent. From a public relations point of view it would obviously assist our cause if were able to say we had examined each complaint made against a prospective member, and were satisfied on the evidence we have seen, that the person is factually innocent of the allegations made. Although, we will, if necessary, make inquiries and do ask awkward questions of intending applicants for membership we cannot possibly audit every application. With about 400 people contacting us each year we simply don’t have the capacity to cope.

Should we be helping support people who might actually be guilty? No we shouldn’t. In fact we withdraw support if we discover this to be the case.

Should we be concerned that we might be infiltrated by paedophiles? Of course we should – not that we provide any access to children.

Should we abandon principles of trust which have served us well for a number of years. Well no! Trust is the essential element in any helping relationship. It is what the police, prosecution authorities, safeguarding workers and investigative bodies rely on in their decision-making. They have to trust that the person who is alleging abuse is actually telling the truth. It is no different for us.

Arguably our position is more rigorous than other professionals

In many respects our position is more rigorous than it is with professionals working in the field. Social workers are required to provide a service without making a distinction between the deserving and undeserving and irrespective of the contribution their client makes to society. Lawyers are also obligated to represent their clients irrespective of whether they (the clients) are telling the truth or not.

Professionally and ideologically there is no reason why FACT should feel uncomfortable about its position. The principle of innocent until proven guilty, is embedded in British justice and whilst one could argue that the decisions of Courts should be respected they cannot claim a monopoly on the truth, or on wisdom – otherwise there would be no need for an Appeal Court, or a Criminal Cases Review Commission.

Innocent people deserve our support

Our job is not to act as judge and jury but rather to accept that vast numbers of people, who each year are found guilty in our Courts, are indeed factually innocent, and deserve support.

See also

Support for the falsely accused

How to cope with the psychological impact of a false allegation